100% or 95% Uptime Guarantee??

[BrienoBrain]

Would you go for a host with 100% or 95% uptime guarantee?

[frion]

100% guarantee - dare say it's quite impossible.
I'd go with 99% uptime guarantee like SolidHost.com. Their uptime is really amazing.

[gilmore]

I'd go with 95% uptime guarantee web host as 100% uptime is impossible due to many technical issues.
My host (MarbleHost.com) guarantees 99.9% uptime and it's true.

[bigbyte]

95% is really bad. Don't look for anything less than 99% or better 99.5% uptime.

[Zekeetas]

99.9% network and server uptime service level is really good, especially when provider's uptime has been checked by the third-party monitoring services like in the case of HostV.com.

[si~zif]

I'd go with the company that promise 99.9% uptime guarantee. Let's take ServerPoint.com, they offer that for their clients and it's true. Anything may happen, that's why 100% sounds incredible.

[BrienoBrain]

Originally Posted by si~zif

I'd go with the company that promise 99.9% uptime guarantee. Let's take ServerPoint.com, they offer that for their clients and it's true. Anything may happen, that's why 100% sounds incredible.

Anyway may be called server reboots both scheduled and not
I think that Serverpoint.com uptime figure is quite realistic and will meet needs any mission-critical site.

[fridrich]

As I see that the greater part of web hosting company doesn't guarantee 100% uptime. And it's true as some glitches may occur in the datacenter and it's impossible to guarantee so high uptime.
WebHostGiant.com, for example guarantees different per cent of server uptime and network uptime. Network uptime is higher than server one.